At the Delivery Horizon, the team plans the best way – most rapid, efficient, or accurate – to decompose features to stories for the immediate work effort, and in alignment with the team priorities and context.
The agile approaches and activities are continually redefined and business analysis methods change and evolve as feedback is received.
The plans for stakeholder engagement are relative to the specific needs of the Delivery Horizon.
The approach for establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with the stakeholders is an ongoing adaptive process and includes stakeholders from across all initiatives in the organization who have direct interaction with the solution and provide in-depth andd etailed feedback regarding the solution.
The delivery team defines what business analysis governance is needed to define decisions for requirements. This includes how refinement will happen, what information radiators are needed for stakeholders, and how changes will be communicated within the team.
The approach for how business analysis information will be stored and accessed is defined through ongoing collaboration within the delivery team. To facilitate continuous improvements, feedback and learning is shared with the other horizons.
Business analysis practitioners consider improvements that can be made to ongoing analysis activities. Speed and accuracy become very important in analysis practiced at the Delivery Horizon, and any process improvements that are identified are considered for implementation.
Assessing business analysis work and planning to improve processes is continuous and based on ongoing feedback. Measures focus on the ability to learn and adapt based on ongoing feedback.
Preparing for elicitation considers what kinds of elicitation are necessary: decomposing features to stories? Reviewing stories? Elaborating on features already underway? Each may require different preparation.
Conducting elicitation may take different forms at the Delivery Horizon. Communication may be casual or formal, consistent or sporadic, but it is always continuous.
Confirming elicitation results may be specific to reviewing a discussion or communication, but may also be done as the review and approval of user stories for implementation.
At the Delivery Horizon, communicating business analysis information includes communicating cross-team dependencies and discussing priorities with stakeholders. Context and analysis models help communicate how backlog items align to the desired outcome.
Driving collaboration and connection is a core agile value, and a core agile business analysis value. Business analysis practitioners find ways to ensure that activities are transparent and communicated.
Stories are traced to features, which may in turn be traced to the desired outcomes. Additional tracings may be made to business goals, users affected, and any number of metrics.
Efforts focus on aligning backlog items and requirements to the product roadmap and goals.
User stories and features are monitored for staleness. As time passes, it is likely that the business need, business environment, technical environment, or customer need will have changed. User stories may need to be revised, re- prioritized, or removed.
At the Delivery Horizon there is frequent change to the prioritization of backlog items as learning occurs from delivered stories and completed features.
User stories and features are monitored for staleness. As time passes, it is likely that the business need, business environment, technical environment, or customer need will have changed. User stories may need to be revised, re-prioritized, or removed.
The creator of an artifact or deliverable has their work approved by someone other than themselves, preferably someone with a view of the desired value being delivered. User stories and any supporting documents are frequently approved by the business owner in this task.
Collaborating with the product owner and others, business analysis practitioners examine a specific portion of the current solution. Care is given to keep scope focused on those things that will be immediately affected, given the nature of the Delivery Horizon.
The immediate future state is considered and defined, focusing on the value that will be delivered in the upcoming delivery cycle. Current work is assessed to ensure it aligns to the desired outcomes of the initiative.
Change strategy is lightweight and is done at the completion of each delivery release. When a set of requirements for a product or service is released to stakeholders, the team elicits feedback to understand if the requirements met the need and solved the problem.
Based on this feedback, the team can make any necessary changes to the backlog.
The Delivery Horizon specifies and models requirements in the form of lightweight documentation such as user stories, job stories, wireframes, or product backlog items.
Business analysis practitioners collaborate with the delivery team to decide on the form of user stories as well as what other supporting artifacts will be used.
Requirements may include necessary metadata such as traceability to features, metrics, and other sources.
Design options are evaluated and selected, collaboratively and with input from team members and stakeholders. A user story narrative form will frequently leave the greatest possible room for the design to fulfill the requirements. The actual form of those may be decided on or altered at the last responsible moment, which may be within the time frame of the Delivery Horizon.
Implemented stories should be altering solution performance, either individually or as they accumulate. Stories have the expectation that they will move one or more metrics in a known direction. That expectation may or may not be fulfilled; this becomes an important source of learning and feedback.
Analyzing performance measures at the Delivery Horizon will help inform the decision of whether to continue, discontinue, or change the stories currently in the backlog. For example, once sufficient beneficial change has been achieved that is related to a particular feature, the team may choose to work on a different feature.
The purpose is to identify any limitations that would affect the delivery options. For example, a team should identify any infrastructure limitations to the intended solution.
This is lightweight and focusing on what is known now and what is needed now for delivery.
This activity is of high priority at the Delivery Horizon. A subtle difference in implemented stories is where value can be enhanced or diminished. Learning and feedback about implementations and metrics will drive this activity.